Active Directory Domain V2R7

a

User accounts with delegated authority must be removed from Windows built-in administrative groups or remove the delegated authority from the accounts.

CM-6 - Low - CCI-000366 - V-8521 - SV-9018r3_rule

RMF Control

CM-6

Severity

L

CCI

CCI-000366

Version

AD.0260

Vuln IDs

V-8521

Rule IDs

SV-9018r3_rule

In AD it is possible to delegate account and other AD object ownership and administration tasks. (This is commonly done for help desk or other user support staff.) This is done to avoid the need to assign users to Windows groups with more widely ranging privileges. If a user with delegated authority to user accounts in a specific OU is also a member of the Administrators group, that user has the ability to reconfigure a wide range of domain security settings and change user accounts outside of the OU to which s/he is a delegated authority. A lack of specific baseline documentation of accounts with delegated privileges makes it impossible to determine if the configured privileges are consistent with the intended security policy.Information Assurance ManagerECLP-1, ECPA-1

Checks: C-7674r2_chk

1. Interview the IAM or site representative and obtain the list of accounts that have been delegated AD object ownership or update permissions and that are not members of Windows built-in administrative groups. (This includes accounts for help desk or support personnel who are not Administrators, but have authority in AD to maintain user accounts or printers.) 2. If accounts with delegated authority are defined and there is no list, then this is a finding. 3. Count the number of accounts on the list. 4. If the number of accounts with delegated authority is greater than 10, review the site documentation that justifies this number. Validate that the IAM explicitly acknowledges the need to have a high number of privileged users. 5. If the number of accounts with delegated authority is greater than 10 and there is no statement in the documentation that justifies the number, then this is a finding.

Fix: F-8049r1_fix

1. Remove user accounts with delegated authority from Windows built-in administrative groups or remove the delegated authority from the accounts. 2. Document all user accounts with delegated AD object ownership or update authority. 3. Annotate the account list with a statement such as, “The high number of privileged accounts is required to address site operational requirements.” 4. Reduce the number of user accounts with delegated AD object ownership or update authority.

b

A VPN must be used to protect directory network traffic for directory service implementation spanning enclave boundaries.

SC-8 - Medium - CCI-002418 - V-8522 - SV-30991r3_rule

RMF Control

SC-8

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-002418

Version

DS00.1140_AD

Vuln IDs

V-8522

Rule IDs

SV-30991r3_rule

The normal operation of AD requires the use of IP network ports and protocols to support queries, replication, user authentication, and resource authorization services. At a minimum, LDAP or LDAPS is usually required for communication with every domain controller. DoD Ports, Protocols, and Services Management (PPSM) policy restricts the use of LDAP, LDAPS, and many of the AD-related protocols across enclave boundaries because vulnerabilities exist in the protocols or service implementations. To comply with the restrictions and address the vulnerabilities, a VPN implementation may be used. If AD data traverses enclave network boundaries using a vulnerable protocol or service without the protection provided by a VPN, that data might be subject to tampering or interception. Further Policy Details: Implement a VPN or other network protection solution in accordance with the Network Infrastructure STIG that protects AD data in transit across DoD enclave boundaries. VPN requirements will include registering the VPN and connection points with the PPSM. Current guidance is available in the Network Infrastructure STIG and from the PPSM.Information Assurance OfficerInformation Assurance ManagerDCPP-1

Checks: C-14102r3_chk

1. Review the site's network diagram(s) to determine if domain controllers for the domain are located in multiple enclaves. The object is to determine if network traffic is traversing enclave network boundaries. 2. Request information about RODC or ADAM instances are installed. In particular, request details of Active Diretory functionality installed or extended into the DMZ or configured/allowed to cross the sites outbound firewall boundary. Ensure communications and replication traffic is encrypted. 3. If domain controllers are not located in multiple enclaves, then this check is not applicable. 4. If domain controllers are located in multiple enclaves, verify that a VPN is used to transport the network traffic (replication, user logon, queries, etc.). 5. If a VPN solution is not used to transport directory network traffic across enclave boundaries, then this is a finding. 6. If the ADAM mode is in use and a migration plan for converting to RODC is not in place, then this is a finding.

Fix: F-15010r2_fix

Implement a VPN or other network protection solution in accordance with the Network Infrastructure STIG that protects AD data in transit across DoD enclave boundaries.

b

If a VPN is used in the AD implementation, the traffic must be inspected by the network Intrusion detection system (IDS).

AC-17 - Medium - CCI-000067 - V-8523 - SV-30994r3_rule

RMF Control

AC-17

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-000067

Version

DS00.4140_AD

Vuln IDs

V-8523

Rule IDs

SV-30994r3_rule

To provide data confidentiality, a VPN is configured to encrypt the data being transported. While this protects the data, some implementations do not allow that data to be processed through an intrusion detection system (IDS) that could detect data from a compromised system or malicious client. Further policy details:Replace the VPN solution or reconfigure it so that directory data is processed by a network or host-based intrusion detection system (IDS). Information Assurance OfficerEBVC-1

Checks: C-14101r2_chk

1. Interview the site representative. Ask about the location of the domain controllers. 2. If domain controllers are not located in multiple enclaves, then this check is not applicable. 3. If domain controllers are located in multiple enclaves and a VPN is not used, then this check is not applicable. 4. If domain controllers are located in multiple enclaves and a VPN is used, review the site network diagram(s) with the SA, NSO, or network reviewer as required to determine if the AD network traffic is visible to a network or host IDS. 5. If the AD network traffic is not visible to a network or host IDS, then this is a finding.

Fix: F-27873r1_fix

Replace the VPN solution or reconfigure it so that directory data is inspected by a network or host-based IDS.

b

Active Directory must be supported by multiple domain controllers where the Risk Management Framework categorization for Availability is moderate or high.

CM-6 - Medium - CCI-000366 - V-8524 - SV-30996r3_rule

RMF Control

CM-6

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-000366

Version

DS00.6140_AD

Vuln IDs

V-8524

Rule IDs

SV-30996r3_rule

In Active Directory (AD) architecture, multiple domain controllers provide availability through redundancy. If an AD domain or servers within it have an Availability categorization of medium or high and the domain is supported by only a single domain controller, an outage of that machine can prevent users from accessing resources on servers in that domain and in other AD domains.Information Assurance OfficerCOTR-1

Checks: C-66391r2_chk

Determine the Availability categorization information for the domain. If the Availability categorization of the domain is low, this is NA. If the Availability categorization of the domain is moderate or high, verify the domain is supported by more than one domain controller. Start "Active Directory Users and Computers" (Available from various menus or run "dsa.msc"). Expand the left pane item that matches the domain being reviewed. Select the Domain Controllers Organizational Unit (OU) in the left pane. If there is only one domain controller in the OU, this is a finding.

Fix: F-71779r1_fix

Implement multiple domain controllers in domains with an Availability categorization of moderate or high.

a

Active Directory implementation information must be added to the organization contingency plan where the Risk Management Framework categorization for Availability is moderate or high.

CM-6 - Low - CCI-000366 - V-8525 - SV-30995r4_rule

RMF Control

CM-6

Severity

L

CCI

CCI-000366

Version

DS00.6120_AD

Vuln IDs

V-8525

Rule IDs

SV-30995r4_rule

When an incident occurs that requires multiple Active Directory (AD) domain controllers to be rebuilt, it is critical to understand the AD hierarchy and replication flow so that the correct recovery sequence and configuration values can be selected. Without appropriate AD forest, tree and domain structural documentation, it may be impossible or very time consuming to reconstruct the original configuration.Information Assurance OfficerCODP-1, CODP-2, CODP-3, COEF-1, COEF-2

Checks: C-66395r2_chk

Determine the Availability categorization information for the domain. If the Availability categorization of the domain is low, this is NA. If the Availability categorization of the domain is moderate or high, verify the organization's disaster recovery plans includes documentation on the AD hierarchy (forest, tree and domain structure). (A chart showing forest hierarchy and domain names is the minimum suggested.) If the disaster recovery plans do not include directory hierarchy information, this is a finding.

Fix: F-71783r1_fix

Update the disaster recovery plans to include the AD hierarchy structure for domains with an Availability categorization of moderate or high.

a

The impact of INFOCON changes on the cross-directory authentication configuration must be considered and procedures documented.

CM-6 - Low - CCI-000366 - V-8526 - SV-31214r2_rule

RMF Control

CM-6

Severity

L

CCI

CCI-000366

Version

DS00.7100_AD

Vuln IDs

V-8526

Rule IDs

SV-31214r2_rule

When incidents occur that require a change in the INFOCON status, it may be necessary to take action to restrict or disable certain types of access that is based on a directory outside the Component’s control. Cross-directory configurations (such as trusts and pass-through authentication) are specifically designed to enable resource access across directories. If conditions indicate that an outside directory is at increased risk of compromise in the immediate or near future, actions to avoid a spread of the effects of the compromise should be taken. A trusted outside directory that is compromised could allow an unauthorized user to access resources in the trusting directory.Information Assurance OfficerVIIR-1, VIIR-2

Checks: C-14104r1_chk

1. Refer to the list of actual manual AD trusts (cross-directory configurations) collected from the site representative. 2. If there are no manual AD trusts (cross-directory configurations) defined, this check is not applicable. For AD, this includes external, forest, or realm trust relationship types. 3. Obtain a copy of the site’s supplemental INFOCON procedures as required by Strategic Command Directive (SD) 527-1. 4. Verify that it has been determined by the IAM whether INFOCON response actions need to include procedures to disable manual AD trusts (cross-directory configurations). The objective is to determine if the need has been explicitly evaluated. 5. If it has been determined that actions to disable manual AD trusts (cross-directory configurations) are not necessary, then this check is not applicable. 6. If it has been determined that actions to disable manual AD trusts (cross-directory configurations) *are* necessary, verify that the policy to implement these actions has been documented. 7. If actions to disable manual AD trusts (cross-directory configurations) *are* needed and no policy has been documented, then this is a finding.

Fix: F-15012r1_fix

Evaluate cross-directory configurations (such as trusts and pass-through authentication) and provide documentation that indicates: 1. That an evaluation was performed. 2. The specific AD trust configurations, if any, that should be disabled during changes in INFOCON status because they could represent increased risk.

a

Each cross-directory authentication configuration must be documented.

CM-6 - Low - CCI-000366 - V-8530 - SV-30989r3_rule

RMF Control

CM-6

Severity

L

CCI

CCI-000366

Version

DS00.1120_AD

Vuln IDs

V-8530

Rule IDs

SV-30989r3_rule

Active Directory (AD) external, forest, and realm trust configurations are designed to extend resource access to a wider range of users (those in other directories). If specific baseline documentation of authorized AD external, forest, and realm trust configurations is not maintained, it is impossible to determine if the configurations are consistent with the intended security policy.Information Assurance OfficerDCID-1

Checks: C-66399r1_chk

Start "Active Directory Domains and Trusts" (Available from various menus or run "domain.msc"). Select the left pane item that matches the name of the domain being reviewed. Right-click the domain name and select "Properties". Select the "Trusts" tab. For each outbound and inbound external, forest, and realm trust, record the name of the other party (domain name), the trust type, transitivity, and the trust direction. (Keep this trust information for use in subsequent checks.) Compare the list of trusts identified with documentation maintained by the ISSO. For each trust, the documentation must contain the following: Type (external, forest, or realm) Name of the other party Confidentiality, Availability, and Integrity categorization Classification level of the other party Trust direction (inbound and/or outbound) Transitivity Status of the Selective Authentication option Status of the SID filtering option If an identified trust is not listed in the documentation or if any of the required items are not documented, this is a finding.

Fix: F-71787r1_fix

Develop documentation for each AD external, forest, and realm trust configuration. At a minimum this must include: Type (external, forest, or realm) Name of the other party Confidentiality, Availability, and Integrity categorization Classification level of the other party Trust direction (inbound and/or outbound) Transitivity Status of the Selective Authentication option Status of the SID filtering option

b

Access to need-to-know information must be restricted to an authorized community of interest.

CM-6 - Medium - CCI-000366 - V-8533 - SV-9030r2_rule

RMF Control

CM-6

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-000366

Version

AD.0170

Vuln IDs

V-8533

Rule IDs

SV-9030r2_rule

Because trust relationships effectively eliminate a level of authentication in the trusting domain or forest, they represent less stringent access control at the domain or forest level in which the resource resides. To mitigate this risk, trust relationships must be documented so that they can be readily verified during periodic inspections designed to validate only approved trusts are configured in AD.Information Assurance OfficerECAN-1

Checks: C-7696r1_chk

1. Before performing this check, perform V-8530 which validates the trusts within the documentation are current within AD. 2. Obtain documentation of the site's approved trusts from the site representative. 3. For each of the identified trusts, verify that the documentation includes a justification or explanation of the need-to-know basis of the trust. 4. If the need for the trust is not documented, then this is a finding.

Fix: F-8062r1_fix

Delete the unneeded trust relationship or document the access requirement or mission need for the trust.

c

Interconnections between DoD directory services of different classification levels must use a cross-domain solution that is approved for use with inter-classification trusts.

CM-6 - High - CCI-000366 - V-8534 - SV-9031r2_rule

RMF Control

CM-6

Severity

H

CCI

CCI-000366

Version

AD.0180

Vuln IDs

V-8534

Rule IDs

SV-9031r2_rule

If a robust cross-domain solution is not used, then it could permit unauthorized access to classified data. To support secure access between resources of different classification levels, the solution must meet discretionary access control requirements. There are currently, no DOD- approved solutions. Further Policy Details: Do not define trust relationships between domains, forests, or realms with resources at different classification levels. The configuration of a trust relationship is one of the steps used to allow users in one AD domain to access resources in another domain, forest, or Kerberos realm. (This check does not apply to trusts with non-DoD organizations since these trusts are examined in a previous check.)Information Assurance OfficerECIC-1

Checks: C-7698r1_chk

1. Refer to the list of identified trusts and the trust documentation provided by the site representative. (Obtained in V-8530) 2. For each of the identified trusts between DoD organizations, compare the classification level (unclassified, confidential, secret, and top secret) of the domain being reviewed with the classification level of the other trust party as noted in the documentation. 3. If the classification level of the domain being reviewed is different than the classification level of any of the entities for which a trust relationship is defined, then this is a finding.

Fix: F-8063r1_fix

Delete the trust relationship that is defined between entities with resources at different DoD classification levels.

c

A controlled interface must have interconnections among DoD information systems operating between DoD and non-DoD systems or networks.

CM-6 - High - CCI-000366 - V-8536 - SV-9033r2_rule

RMF Control

CM-6

Severity

H

CCI

CCI-000366

Version

AD.0181

Vuln IDs

V-8536

Rule IDs

SV-9033r2_rule

The configuration of an AD trust relationship is one of the steps used to allow users in one domain to access resources in another domain, forest, or Kerberos realm. When a trust is defined between a DoD organization and a non-DoD organization, the security posture of the two organizations might be significantly different. If the non-DoD organization maintained a less secure environment and that environment were compromised, the presence of the AD trust might allow the DoD environment to be compromised also.Information Assurance OfficerECIC-1

Checks: C-7699r1_chk

1. Refer to the list of identified trusts obtained in a previous check (V8530). 2. For each of the identified trusts, determine if the other trust party is a non-DoD entity. For example, if the fully qualified domain name of the other party does not end in “.mil”, the other party is probably not a DoD entity. 3. Review the local documentation approving the external network connection and documentation indicating explicit approval of the trust by the DAA. 4. The external network connection documentation is maintained by the IAO\NSO for compliance with the Network Infrastructure STIG. 5. If any trust is defined with a non-DoD system and there is no documentation indicating approval of the external network connection and explicit DAA approval of the trust, then this is a finding.

Fix: F-28136r1_fix

Obtain DAA approval and document external, forest, or realm trust relationship. Or obtain documentation of the network connection approval and explicit trust approval by the DAA.

b

Security identifiers (SIDs) must be configured to use only authentication data of directly trusted external or forest trust.

IA-2 - Medium - CCI-000764 - V-8538 - SV-9035r3_rule

RMF Control

IA-2

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-000764

Version

AD.0190

Vuln IDs

V-8538

Rule IDs

SV-9035r3_rule

Under some circumstances it is possible for attackers or rogue administrators that have compromised a domain controller in a trusted domain to use the SID history attribute (sIDHistory) to associate SIDs with new user accounts, granting themselves unauthorized rights. To help prevent this type of attack, SID filter quarantining is enabled by default on all external trusts. However, it is possible for an administrator to change this setting or the trust may have been created in an older version of AD. SID filtering causes SID references that do not refer to the directly trusted domain or forest to be removed from inbound access requests in the trusting domain. Without SID filtering, access requests could contain spoofed SIDs, permitting unauthorized access. In cases where access depends on SID history or Universal Groups, failure to enable SID filtering could result in operational problems, including denial of access to authorized users. When the quarantine switch is applied to external or forest trusts, only those SIDs from the single, directly trusted domain are valid. In effect, enabling /quarantine on a trust relationship will break the transitivity of that trust so that only the specific domains on either side of the trust are considered participants in the trust.Information Assurance OfficerECAN-1, ECCD-1, ECCD-2

Checks: C-58507r2_chk

Open "Active Directory Domains and Trusts". (Available from various menus or run "domain.msc".) Right click the domain in the left pane and select Properties. Select the Trusts tab. Note any existing trusts and the type. If no trusts exist, this is NA. If the trust type is External, run the following command on the trusting domain: "netdom trust <trusting domain> /d:<trusted domain> /quarantine" If the result does not specify "SID filtering is enabled for this trust. Only SIDs from the trusted domain will be accepted for authorization data returned during authentication. SIDs from other domains will be removed.", this is a finding. If the trust type is Forest, run the following command on the trusting domain: "netdom trust <trusting domain> /d:<trusted domain> /enablesidhistory" If the result does not specify "SID history is disabled for this trust", this is a finding.

Fix: F-62885r2_fix

Ensure SID filtering is enabled on all external trusts. You can enable SID filtering only from the trusting side of the trust. Enter the following line from a command line: netdom trust <TrustingDomainName> /d:<TrustedDomainName> /quarantine:Yes /usero:<DomainAdministratorAcct> /passwordo:<DomainAdminPwd> Ensure SID history is disabled for all forest trusts. You can disable SID history only from the trusting side of the trust. Enter the following line from a command line: netdom trust <TrustingDomainName> /d:<TrustedDomainName> /enablesidhistory:No /usero:<DomainAdministratorAcct> /passwordo:<DomainAdminPwd>

b

Selective Authentication must be enabled on outgoing forest trusts.

AC-3 - Medium - CCI-000213 - V-8540 - SV-9037r3_rule

RMF Control

AC-3

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-000213

Version

AD.0200

Vuln IDs

V-8540

Rule IDs

SV-9037r3_rule

Enabling Selective Authentication on outbound Active Directory (AD) forest trusts significantly strengthens access control by requiring explicit authorization (through the Allowed to Authenticate permission) on resources in the trusting forest. When Selective Authentication is not enabled, less secure resource access permissions (such as those that specify Authenticated Users) might permit unauthorized access.Implementation requires configuration of the Allowed to Authenticate permission on resources in the trusting domain for which access is desired. Failure to configure this permission could result in operational problems including denied resource access to authorized users.Information Assurance OfficerECAN-1, ECCD-1, ECCD-2

Checks: C-66407r2_chk

Open "Active Directory Domains and Trusts". (Available from various menus or run "domain.msc".) Right click the domain name in the left pane and select "Properties". Select the "Trusts" tab. For each outgoing forest trust, right-click the trust item and select "Properties". Select the "Authentication" tab. If the "Selective Authentication" option is not selected on every outgoing forest trust, this is a finding.

Fix: F-71795r1_fix

Enable Selective Authentication on outgoing forest trust. Open "Active Directory Domains and Trusts". (Available from various menus or run "domain.msc".) Right click the domain name in the left pane and select "Properties". Select the "Trusts" tab. For each outgoing forest trust, right-click the trust item and select "Properties". Select the "Authentication" tab. Select the "Selective Authentication" option. (It may be necessary to configure the "Allowed to Authenticate" permission on resources in the trusting domain.)

b

The Anonymous Logon and Everyone groups must not be members of the Pre-Windows 2000 Compatible Access group.

IA-8 - Medium - CCI-000804 - V-8547 - SV-9044r3_rule

RMF Control

IA-8

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-000804

Version

AD.0220

Vuln IDs

V-8547

Rule IDs

SV-9044r3_rule

The Pre-Windows 2000 Compatible Access group was created to allow Windows NT domains to interoperate with AD domains by allowing unauthenticated access to certain AD data. The default permissions on many AD objects are set to allow access to the Pre-Windows 2000 Compatible Access group. When the Anonymous Logon or Everyone groups are members of the Pre-Windows 2000 Compatible Access group, anonymous access to many AD objects is enabled. Anonymous access to AD data could provide valuable account or configuration information to an intruder trying to determine the most effective attack strategies.System AdministratorInformation Assurance OfficerECAN-1, ECCD-1, ECCD-2

Checks: C-66411r2_chk

Open "Active Directory Users and Computers" (available from various menus or run "dsa.msc"). Expand the domain being reviewed in the left pane and select the "Builtin" container. Double-click on the "Pre-Windows 2000 Compatible Access" group in the right pane. Select the "Members" tab. If the "Anonymous Logon" or "Everyone" groups are members, this is a finding. (By default, these groups are not included in current Windows versions.)

Fix: F-71799r1_fix

Ensure the "Anonymous Logon" and "Everyone" groups are not members of the "Pre-Windows 2000 Compatible Access group". (By default, these groups are not included in current Windows versions.) Open "Active Directory Users and Computers" (available from various menus or run "dsa.msc"). Expand the domain being reviewed in the left pane and select the "Builtin" container. Double-click on the "Pre-Windows 2000 Compatible Access" group in the right pane. Select the "Members" tab. If the "Anonymous Logon" or "Everyone" groups are members, select each and click "Remove".

b

The number of member accounts in privileged groups must not be excessive.

CM-6 - Medium - CCI-000366 - V-8548 - SV-9045r2_rule

RMF Control

CM-6

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-000366

Version

AD.0240

Vuln IDs

V-8548

Rule IDs

SV-9045r2_rule

Membership in the following Windows security groups assigns a high privilege level for AD functions: Domain Admins, Enterprise Admins, Schema Admins, Group Policy Creator Owners, and Incoming Forest Trust Builders. When a large number of users are members of highly privileged groups, the risk from unintended updates or compromised accounts is significantly increased. A lack of specific baseline documentation on privileged group membership makes it impossible to determine if the assigned accounts are consistent with the intended security policy. Further Policy Details: It is possible to move the highly privileged AD security groups out of the AD Users container. If the Domain Admins, Enterprise Admins, Schema Admins, or Group Policy Creator Owners groups are not in the AD Users container, ask the SA for the new location and use that location for this check.Information Assurance ManagerECLP-1, ECPA-1

Checks: C-7707r1_chk

1. Start the Active Directory Users and Computers console (Start, Run, “dsa.msc”). 2. Select and expand the left pane item that matches the name of the domain being reviewed. 3. Select the Built-in container. If the Incoming Forest Trust Builders group is defined perform the following: a. Double-click on the group and select the Members tab b. Count the number of accounts in the group c. Compare the accounts in the group with the local documentation. 4. Select the Users container. For each of the Domain Admins, Enterprise Admins, Schema Admins, and Group Policy Creator Owners groups perform the following: a. Double-click on the group and select the Members tab b. Count the number of accounts in the group c. Compare the accounts in the group with the local documentation. 5. If an account in a highly privileged AD security group is not listed in the local documentation, then this is a finding. 6. If the number of accounts defined in a highly privileged AD security group is greater than the number below, review the site documentation that justifies this number. a. For the Enterprise Admins, Schema Admins, Group Policy Creator Owners, and Incoming Forest Trust Builders groups, the number of accounts should be between zero (0) and five (5). b. The number of Domain Admins should be between one (1) and ten (10). 7. If the number of accounts defined in a highly privileged AD security group is greater than the guidance above and there is no documentation that justifies the number, then this is a finding.

Fix: F-8068r1_fix

Update the site documentation to include all the accounts that are members of highly privileged groups. Annotate the account list(s) with a statement such as, “The high number of privileged accounts is required to address site operational requirements.” Reduce the number of accounts in highly privileged groups to the minimum level necessary.

b

Accounts from outside directories that are not part of the same organization or are not subject to the same security policies must be removed from all highly privileged groups.

CM-6 - Medium - CCI-000366 - V-8549 - SV-31557r2_rule

RMF Control

CM-6

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-000366

Version

DS00.3200_AD

Vuln IDs

V-8549

Rule IDs

SV-31557r2_rule

Membership in certain default directory groups assigns a high privilege level for access to the directory. In AD, membership in the following groups enables high privileges relative to AD and the Windows OS: Domain Admins, Enterprise Admins, Schema Admins, Group Policy Creator Owners, and Incoming Forest Trust Builders. When accounts from an outside directory are members of highly privileged groups in the directory being reviewed, less rigorous security policies or compromises of accounts in the outside directory could increase the risk to the directory where the privileged groups are defined. A compromise to the outside directory would allow unauthorized, privileged access.System AdministratorInformation Assurance OfficerECLP-1, ECPA-1

Checks: C-14111r1_chk

1. Start the Active Directory Users and Computers console (Start, Run, “dsa.msc”). 2. Select and expand the left pane item that matches the name of the domain being reviewed. 3. Select the Built-in container. a. If the Incoming Forest Trust Builders group is defined, double-click on the group, and select the Members tab b. Examine the defined accounts to see if they are from a domain that is not in the forest being reviewed. 4. Select the Users container a. For each group (Domain Admins, Enterprise Admins, Schema Admins, and Group Policy Creator Owners), double-click on the group, and select the Members tab. b. Examine the defined accounts to see if they are from a domain that is not in the forest being reviewed. 5. If any account in a privileged group is from a domain outside the forest being reviewed and that outside forest is not maintained by the same organization (e.g., enclave) or subject to the same security policies, then this is a finding. Supplementary Notes: Note: An account that is from an outside domain appears in the format “outside-domain-NetBIOSname\account” or “account@outside-domain-fully-qualified-name”. Examples are “AOFN21\jsmith” or “jsmith@AOFN21.OST.COM”. It may be necessary to use the AD Domains and Trusts (domain.msc) console to determine if the domain is from another AD forest. Note: It is possible to move the highly privileged AD security groups out of the AD Users container. If the Domain Admins, Enterprise Admins, Schema Admins, or Group Policy Creator Owners groups are not in the AD Users container, ask the SA for the new location and use that location for this check.

Fix: F-28135r1_fix

Remove accounts from outside directories that are not part of the same organization or are not subject to the same security policies from the highly privileged groups.

b

The domain functional level must be at a Windows Server version still supported by Microsoft.

CM-6 - Medium - CCI-000366 - V-8551 - SV-9048r3_rule

RMF Control

CM-6

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-000366

Version

AD.0160

Vuln IDs

V-8551

Rule IDs

SV-9048r3_rule

Domains operating at functional levels below Windows Server versions no longer supported by Microsoft reduce the level of security in the domain and forest as advanced features of the directory are not available. This also prevents the addition of domain controllers to the domain using Windows Server versions prior to the current domain functional level.System AdministratorInformation Assurance OfficerECSC-1

Checks: C-58021r1_chk

Open "Active Directory Domains and Trusts" (run "domain.msc") or "Active Directory Users and Computers" (run "dsa.msc"). Right click in the left pane on the name of the Domain being reviewed. Select "Raise domain functional level…" The current domain functional level will be displayed (as well as the option to raise the domain functional level). Select "Cancel" to exit. Alternately, using PowerShell (Windows 2008 R2 or later). Select "Active Directory Module for Windows PowerShell", available in Administrative Tools or the Start Screen. Run "Get-ADDomain". View the value for "DomainMode:" If the current domain functional level is a Windows Server version no longer supported by Microsoft, this is a finding. Microsoft will no longer support Windows Server 2003 after 14 July 2015.

Fix: F-62383r1_fix

Raise the domain functional level to a Windows Server version still supported by Microsoft. Microsoft will no longer support Windows Server 2003 after 14 July 2015. Raising the domain functional level needs to be carefully planned and implemented. This prevents the addition of domain controllers to the domain using Windows versions prior to the current domain functional level. See Microsoft documentation for the process and requirements of raising the domain functional level.

b

Inter-site replication must be enabled and configured to occur at least daily.

CM-6 - Medium - CCI-000366 - V-8553 - SV-30992r3_rule

RMF Control

CM-6

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-000366

Version

DS00.3230_AD

Vuln IDs

V-8553

Rule IDs

SV-30992r3_rule

Timely replication makes certain that directory service data is consistent across all servers that support the same scope of data for their clients. In AD implementation using AD Sites, domain controllers defined to be in different AD Sites require Site links to specify properties for replication scheduling. If AD Site link schedule and replication interval properties are configured improperly, AD data replication may not occur frequently enough and updates to identification, authentication, or authorization data may not be current on all domain controllers. If this data is not current, access to resources may be incorrectly granted or denied. The default for inter-site replication is to occur every 180 minutes, 24 hours a day.System AdministratorInformation Assurance OfficerECAN-1, ECCD-1, ECCD-2

Checks: C-66415r2_chk

Open "Active Directory Sites and Services". (Available from various menus or run "dssite.msc".) Expand "Sites" in the left pane. If only a single site exists, this is NA. By default the first site in a domain is named "Default-First-Site-Name" but may have been changed. If more than one site exists, expand "Inter-Site Transports" and select "IP". For each site link that is defined in the right pane perform the following: Right click the site link item and select "Properties". If the interval on the "General" tab for the "Replicate every" field is greater than "1440", this is a finding. Click the "Change Schedule" button. If the time frames selected for "Replication Available" do not allow for replication to occur at least daily, this is a finding. Click the Cancel buttons to exit.

Fix: F-71803r1_fix

Maintain an Active Directory replication schedule that allows inter-site replication to occur at least on a daily basis. Open "Active Directory Sites and Services". (Available from various menus or run "dssite.msc".) Expand "Sites" in the left pane. Expand "Inter-Site Transports" and select "IP". For each site link that is defined in the right pane perform the following: Right click the site link item and select "Properties". Select an interval in the "Replicate every" field less than "1440". (By default this is 180.) Click the Change Schedule button. Select time frames for "Replication Available" to allow for replication to occur at least daily.

b

Active Directory data must be backed up daily for systems with a Risk Management Framework categorization for Availability of moderate or high. Systems with a categorization of low must be backed up weekly.

CM-6 - Medium - CCI-000366 - V-25385 - SV-31547r3_rule

RMF Control

CM-6

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-000366

Version

DS00.0160_AD

Vuln IDs

V-25385

Rule IDs

SV-31547r3_rule

Failure to maintain a current backup of directory data could make it difficult or impossible to recover from incidents including hardware failure or malicious corruption. A failure to recover from the loss of directory data used in identification and authentication services (i.e., Active Directory) could result in an extended loss of availability. Information Assurance OfficerCODB-1, CODB-2, CODB-3

Checks: C-66403r2_chk

Review the organization's procedures for the backing up active directory data. Verify the frequency at which active directory data is backed up. If the Availability categorization of the domain is low, this must be at least weekly. If the Availability categorization of the domain is moderate or high, this must be at least daily. Verify the type of backup is appropriate to capturing the directory data. For AD domain controllers, this must include a System State data backup. If any of these conditions are not met, this is a finding.

Fix: F-71791r1_fix

Update the organization's procedures for the backing up active directory data. Ensure the frequency at which active directory data is backed up is as follows: If the Availability categorization of the domain is low, this must be at least weekly. If the Availability categorization of the domain is moderate or high, this must be at least daily. Ensure the type of backup is appropriate to capturing the directory data. For AD domain controllers, this must include a System State data backup.

b

The Directory Service Restore Mode (DSRM) password must be changed at least annually.

CM-6 - Medium - CCI-000366 - V-25840 - SV-32179r2_rule

RMF Control

CM-6

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-000366

Version

AD.0151

Vuln IDs

V-25840

Rule IDs

SV-32179r2_rule

This is a tremendously powerful password which should be changed periodically. This password is unique to each DC and is used to logon to a DC when rebooting into the server recovery mode. With a weak or known password, anyone with local access to the DC can reboot this machine, copy or modify the Active Directory database, and reboot the server without leaving any trace of the activity. Failure to change the DSRM password periodically could allow a compromised resource (maliciously or through personnel turnover) to go undetected for an extended period. Failure to change the DSRM password could allow an unknown (lost) password to go undetected. If not corrected during a periodic review, the problem might surface during an actual recovery operation and delay or prevent the recovery.Information Assurance ManagerIAIA-1, IAIA-2

Checks: C-32375r1_chk

1. Interview the IAM. 2. Obtain a copy of the site’s policy that addresses password change frequency. 3. Check that the policy addresses the requirement for the DSRM password to be changed at least yearly. Alternatively review logs or other evidence that indicates that the password has been changed within the last year. Note that there is no known method to check password age online while the server is active as a domain controller. 4. If there is no policy for changing the DSRM password at least yearly or no indication that it has been changed within the last year, then this is a finding.

Fix: F-28702r1_fix

Create or implement a local site policy to change the DSRM password at least yearly.

a

Security vulnerability reviews of the domain and/or forest in which the domain controller resides must be conducted at least annually.

CM-6 - Low - CCI-000366 - V-25841 - SV-32180r2_rule

RMF Control

CM-6

Severity

L

CCI

CCI-000366

Version

AD.9100

Vuln IDs

V-25841

Rule IDs

SV-32180r2_rule

An AD domain controller is impacted by the AD environment created by the security configuration of the domain and forest in which the domain controller resides. A proper review of the AD environment requires checks at the domain controller, domain, and forest level. If the domain or forest-level checks are not performed at the same time or within a reasonable time frame, the domain controller may be at risk from non-secure settings at those levels.Information Assurance OfficerECSC-1

Checks: C-32377r1_chk

1. Verify that the domain and forest in which the domain controller resides have been reviewed using the requirements in the appropriate document in the Active Directory STIG. 2. The security assessment must be conducted at the same time or no more than 1 year prior to the review of the domain controller. 3. VMS asset information, dated reports, or other documentation can be used to provide verification. 4. If it is not possible to verify that the domain and forest have been reviewed, then this is a finding.

Fix: F-28704r1_fix

Perform reviews of the domain and/or forest in which the domain controller resides at least annually.

b

Read-only Domain Controller (RODC) architecture and configuration must comply with directory services requirements.

CM-6 - Medium - CCI-000366 - V-25997 - SV-32648r2_rule

RMF Control

CM-6

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-000366

Version

AD.0270

Vuln IDs

V-25997

Rule IDs

SV-32648r2_rule

The RODC role provides a unidirectional replication method for selected information from your internal network to the DMZ. If not properly configured so that the risk footprint is minimized, the interal domain controller or forest can be compromised. RODC is considered part of the site’s Forest or Domain installation since it is not a standalone product, but rather a role of the the Windows AD DS full installation or Server Core installation. It is possible to have Windows 2003 clients authenticated using RODC, however, compatibility packs are needed. Note that RODC is not authorized for use across the site's perimeter firewall.Information Assurance OfficerECSC-1

Checks: C-32870r1_chk

1. Verify that the site has applied the Network Infrastucture STIG to configure the VPN and IPSec. 2. Verify that IPSec and other communications and security configurations for the management and replication of the RODC will be managed by use of the minimum required Group Policy Objects (GPOs). 3. Include an inspection of the RODC server in the DMZ when inspection for least privilege. 4. Verify that required patches and compatibility packs are installed if RODC is used with Windows 2003 (or earlier) clients. 5. If RODC server and configuration does not comply with requirements, then this is a finding.

Fix: F-29022r1_fix

1. Ensure compliance with VPN and IPSec requirements in the Network Insfrastucture STIG. 2. Ensure IPSec and other communications and security configurations for the management and replication of the RODC uses the minimum required Group Policy Objects (GPOs) to provide the required functionality. 3. Replicate only the information needed to provide the functionality required. If full replication of all directory data is not needed, then replicated selective ID and authentication information as needed to the RODC. 4. Include an inspection of the RODC server in the DMZ when inspection for least privilege.

c

Membership to the Enterprise Admins group must be restricted to accounts used only to manage the Active Directory Forest.

CM-6 - High - CCI-000366 - V-36431 - SV-47837r2_rule

RMF Control

CM-6

Severity

H

CCI

CCI-000366

Version

AD.0001

Vuln IDs

V-36431

Rule IDs

SV-47837r2_rule

The Enterprise Admins group is a highly privileged group. Personnel who are system administrators must log on to Active Directory systems only using accounts with the level of authority necessary. Only system administrator accounts used exclusively to manage the Active Directory Forest may be members of the Enterprise Admins group. A separation of administrator responsibilities helps mitigate the risk of privilege escalation resulting from credential theft attacks.ECPA-1

Checks: C-44673r3_chk

Review the Enterprise Admins group in Active Directory Users and Computers. Any accounts that are members of the Enterprise Admins group must be documented with the IAO. Each Enterprise Administrator must have a separate unique account specifically for managing the Active Directory forest. If any account listed in the Enterprise Admins group is a member of other administrator groups including the Domain Admins group, domain member server administrators groups, or domain workstation administrators groups, this is a finding.

Fix: F-40963r2_fix

Create the necessary documentation that identifies the members of the Enterprise Admins group. Ensure that each member has a separate unique account that can only be used to manage the Active Directory Forest. Remove any Enterprise Admin accounts from other administrator groups.

c

Membership to the Domain Admins group must be restricted to accounts used only to manage the Active Directory domain and domain controllers.

CM-6 - High - CCI-000366 - V-36432 - SV-47838r2_rule

RMF Control

CM-6

Severity

H

CCI

CCI-000366

Version

AD.0002

Vuln IDs

V-36432

Rule IDs

SV-47838r2_rule

The Domain Admins group is a highly privileged group. Personnel who are system administrators must log on to Active Directory systems only using accounts with the level of authority necessary. Only system administrator accounts used exclusively to manage an Active Directory domain and domain controllers may be members of the Domain Admins group. A separation of administrator responsibilities helps mitigate the risk of privilege escalation resulting from credential theft attacks.ECPA-1

Checks: C-44674r2_chk

Review the Domain Admins group in Active Directory Users and Computers. Any accounts that are members of the Domain Admins group must be documented with the IAO. Each Domain Administrator must have a separate unique account specifically for managing the Active Directory domain and domain controllers. If any account listed in the Domain Admins group is a member of other administrator groups including the Enterprise Admins group, domain member server administrators groups, or domain workstation administrators groups, this is a finding.

Fix: F-40964r2_fix

Create the necessary documentation that identifies the members of the Domain Admins group. Ensure that each member has a separate unique account that can only be used to manage the Active Directory domain and domain controllers. Remove any Domain Admin accounts from other administrator groups.

b

Administrators must have separate accounts specifically for managing domain member servers.

CM-6 - Medium - CCI-000366 - V-36433 - SV-47839r2_rule

RMF Control

CM-6

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-000366

Version

AD.0003

Vuln IDs

V-36433

Rule IDs

SV-47839r2_rule

Personnel who are system administrators must log on to domain systems only using accounts with the minimum level of authority necessary. Only system administrator accounts used exclusively to manage domain member servers may be members of an administrator group for domain member servers. A separation of administrator responsibilities helps mitigate the risk of privilege escalation resulting from credential theft attacks.ECPA-1

Checks: C-44675r3_chk

Review the membership groups in Active Directory Users and Computers. Membership groups must be designated at the domain level specifically for domain member server administrators. Domain member server administrator groups and any accounts that are members of the groups must be documented with the IAO. Each member server administrator must have a separate unique account specifically for managing member servers. If any account listed in a domain member server administrator group is a member of other administrator groups including the Enterprise Admins group, the Domain Admins group, or domain workstation administrator groups, this is a finding.

Fix: F-40965r3_fix

Create the necessary documentation that identifies the members of domain member server administrator groups. Ensure that each member has a separate unique account that can only be used to manage domain member servers. Remove any domain member server accounts from other administrator groups.

b

Administrators must have separate accounts specifically for managing domain workstations.

CM-6 - Medium - CCI-000366 - V-36434 - SV-47840r2_rule

RMF Control

CM-6

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-000366

Version

AD.0004

Vuln IDs

V-36434

Rule IDs

SV-47840r2_rule

Personnel who are system administrators must log on to domain systems only using accounts with the minimum level of authority necessary. Only system administrator accounts used exclusively to manage domain workstations may be members of an administrators group for domain workstations. A separation of administrator responsibilities helps mitigate the risk of privilege escalation resulting from credential theft attacks.ECPA-1

Checks: C-44676r3_chk

Review the membership groups in Active Directory Users and Computers. Membership groups must be designated at the domain level specifically for domain workstation administrators. Domain workstation administrator groups and any accounts that are members of the groups must be documented with the IAO. Each domain workstation administrator must have a separate unique account specifically for managing domain workstations. If any account listed in a domain workstation administrator group is a member of other administrator groups including the Enterprise Admins group, the Domain Admins group, or domain member server administrator groups, this is a finding.

Fix: F-40966r3_fix

Create the necessary documentation that identifies the members of domain workstation administrator groups. Ensure that each member has a separate unique account that can only be used to manage domain workstations. Remove any domain workstation administrator accounts from other administrator groups.

c

Delegation of privileged accounts must be prohibited.

CM-6 - High - CCI-000366 - V-36435 - SV-47841r2_rule

RMF Control

CM-6

Severity

H

CCI

CCI-000366

Version

AD.0005

Vuln IDs

V-36435

Rule IDs

SV-47841r2_rule

Privileged accounts such as those belonging to any of the administrator groups must not be trusted for delegation. Allowing privileged accounts to be trusted for delegation provides a means for privilege escalation from a compromised system.ECLP-1

Checks: C-44677r1_chk

Review the properties of all privileged accounts in Active Directory Users and Computers. Under the Account tab, verify "Account is sensitive and cannot be delegated" is selected in the Account Options section. If delegation is not prohibited for any privileged account, this is a finding.

Fix: F-40967r1_fix

Open Active Directory Users and Computers. View the properties of all privileged accounts. Under the Account tab, select "Account is sensitive and cannot be delegated" in the Account Options section.

b

Only systems dedicated for the sole purpose of managing Active Directory must be used to manage Active Directory remotely.

SC-2 - Medium - CCI-001082 - V-36436 - SV-47842r4_rule

RMF Control

SC-2

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-001082

Version

AD.MP.0001

Vuln IDs

V-36436

Rule IDs

SV-47842r4_rule

Only domain systems used exclusively to manage Active Directory (referred to as AD admin platforms) must be used to manage Active Directory remotely. Dedicating domain systems to be used solely for managing Active Directory will aid in protecting privileged domain accounts from being compromised. This includes the management of Active Directory itself and the Domain Controllers (DCs) that run Active Directory, including such activities as domain level user and computer management, administering trusts, replication, schema changes, site topology, domain-wide group policy, the addition of new DCs, DC software installation, and DC backups and restore operations. Some maintenance activities may be delegated and do not require the use of an AD admin platform. These include non-domain level activities such as user and computer management as well as group policy maintenance in site defined organizational units. Accounts that have been delegated these activities must not be members of Domain or Enterprise Admin groups. These activities may still be performed with the use of an AD admin platform for the additional protections they provide.ECSC-1

Checks: C-58505r2_chk

If Active Directory is only managed with local logons to domain controllers, not remotely, this can be marked NA. Verify that any domain systems used to manage Active Directory remotely are used exclusively for managing Active Directory. If domain systems used for managing Active Directory are used for additional functions, this is a finding. In situations where an additional physical machine dedicated to AD admin tasks is not practicable, virtual machines (VM) may be securely employed in either of the following configurations: -Windows 8, Windows Server 2012 or later for the AD admin management role. -Use local guest VMs running within Hyper-V for all other tasks to include admin roles on other servers as well as any user tasks such as web browsing or email. -Use a Type-1 Hypervisor with separate guest VMs for AD admin management roles and any other roles. In either case, the higher integrity AD admin platform and the lower integrity platforms must be separate. The AD admin platform must be configured not to forward the AD admin credentials to other guest VMs or to make the AD admin credentials available to other guest VMs. Additionally, guest VMs for user and less critical admin activities must apply the security requirements from the applicable STIG, especially so that AD admin accounts are denied all logon types.

Fix: F-49310r1_fix

Set aside domain systems to manage Active Directory remotely. Ensure they are used only for the purpose of managing Active Directory. Otherwise, use the local domain controller console to manage Active Directory.

b

Dedicated systems used for managing Active Directory remotely must be blocked from Internet Access.

SC-3 - Medium - CCI-001084 - V-36437 - SV-47843r2_rule

RMF Control

SC-3

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-001084

Version

AD.0007

Vuln IDs

V-36437

Rule IDs

SV-47843r2_rule

A system used to manage Active Directory provides access to highly privileged areas of a domain. Such a system with Internet access may be exposed to numerous attacks and compromise the domain. Restricting Internet access for dedicated systems used to manage Active Directory will aid in protecting privileged domain accounts from being compromised.ECSC-1

Checks: C-44679r4_chk

Verify access to the internet is prevented for systems dedicated to managing Active Directory. Various methods may be employed to accomplish this, such as restrictions at boundary firewalls, through proxy services, or with the Windows Firewall. Review the Internet access restrictions with the administrator. If Internet access is not prevented, this is a finding.

Fix: F-40969r3_fix

Block Internet access for systems dedicated to managing Active Directory. This can be accomplished by restrictions at boundary firewalls, proxy services, with the Windows Firewall or other methods.

b

Local administrator accounts on domain systems must not share the same password.

IA-2 - Medium - CCI-001941 - V-36438 - SV-47844r3_rule

RMF Control

IA-2

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-001941

Version

AD.0008

Vuln IDs

V-36438

Rule IDs

SV-47844r3_rule

Local administrator accounts on domain systems must use unique passwords. In the event a domain system is compromised, sharing the same password for local administrator accounts on domain systems will allow an attacker to move laterally and compromise multiple domain systems.ECSC-1

Checks: C-66437r2_chk

Verify local administrator accounts on domain systems are using unique passwords. If local administrator accounts on domain systems are sharing a password, this is a finding. Microsoft's Local Administrator Password Solution (LAPS) provides an automated solution for maintaining and regularly changing the local administrator password for domain-joined systems. Other automated solutions that provide this capability may also be used. If LAPS has been installed and enabled in the domain, the following PowerShell query will return a list of systems that do not have a local administrator password managed by LAPS. (The LAPS PowerShell module requires PowerShell 2.0 or higher and .NET Framework 4.0.) Start PowerShell. If the LAPS PowerShell module has not been previously imported, execute the following first: "Import-Module AdmPwd.ps". Execute "Get-PwdAdmPassword -ComputerName * | Where-object {$_.password -eq $null}" If any systems are listed, this is a finding. Ignore computers with "OU=Domain Controllers" in the DistinguishedName field.

Fix: F-71825r1_fix

Set unique passwords for all local administrator accounts on domain systems. Microsoft's Local Administrator Password Solution (LAPS) provides an automated solution for maintaining and regularly changing the local administrator password for domain-joined systems. Other automated solutions that provide this capability may also be used. See Microsoft Security Advisory 3062591 for additional information and download of LAPS. https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/security/3062591.aspx

b

Separate smart cards must be used for Enterprise Admin (EA) and Domain Admin (DA) accounts from smart cards used for other accounts.

CM-6 - Medium - CCI-000366 - V-43648 - SV-56469r2_rule

RMF Control

CM-6

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-000366

Version

AD.0009

Vuln IDs

V-43648

Rule IDs

SV-56469r2_rule

A separate smart card for Enterprise Admin and Domain Admin accounts eliminates the automatic exposure of the private keys for the EA/DA accounts to less secure user platforms when the other accounts are used. Having different certificates on one card does not provide the necessary separation. The same smart card may be used by an administrator for both EA and DA accounts. IAIA-1

Checks: C-49394r2_chk

Verify separate smart cards are used for EA and DA accounts from smart cards used for other accounts. EA and DA accounts may be on the same smart card but must be separate from any other accounts. If separate smart cards for EA and DA accounts from other accounts are not used, this is a finding.

Fix: F-49248r2_fix

Use separate smart cards for EA and DA accounts from smart cards used for other accounts. EA and DA accounts may be on the same smart card but must be separate from any other accounts.

b

Enterprise Admin (EA) and Domain Admin (DA) accounts that require smart cards must have the setting Smart card is required for interactive logon disabled and re-enabled at least every 60 days.

IA-5 - Medium - CCI-000199 - V-43649 - SV-56470r2_rule

RMF Control

IA-5

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-000199

Version

AD.0010

Vuln IDs

V-43649

Rule IDs

SV-56470r2_rule

When a smart card is required for a domain account, a long password, unknown to the user, is generated. This password and associated NT hash are not changed as are accounts with passwords controlled by the maximum password age. Disabling and re-enabling the "Smart card is required for interactive logon" replaces the NT hash of the account with a newly randomized hash. Otherwise, the existing NT hash could be re-used for Pass-the-Hash in the future.IAIA-1

Checks: C-49395r3_chk

Verify "Smart card is required for interactive logon" is disabled and re-enabled for all smart card required EA and DA accounts at least every 60 days. If the setting "Smart card is required for interactive logon" is not disabled then re-enabled for all EA and DA accounts that require smart card logons at least every 60 days, this is a finding.

Fix: F-49249r3_fix

Disable then re-enable "Smart card is required for interactive logon" for all smart card required EA and DA accounts at least every 60 days.

b

Administrative accounts for critical servers, that require smart cards, must have the setting Smart card is required for interactive logon disabled and re-enabled at least every 60 days.

IA-5 - Medium - CCI-000199 - V-43650 - SV-56471r2_rule

RMF Control

IA-5

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-000199

Version

AD.0011

Vuln IDs

V-43650

Rule IDs

SV-56471r2_rule

When a smart card is required for a domain account, a long password, unknown to the user, is generated. This password and associated NT hash are not changed as are accounts with passwords controlled by the maximum password age. Disabling and re-enabling the "Smart card is required for interactive logon" replaces the NT hash of the account with a newly randomized hash. Otherwise, the existing NT hash could be re-used for Pass-the-Hash in the future. Critical servers are any servers that provide functions that would significantly degrade mission effectiveness if disrupted, altered, or leaked. Examples include email, collaboration (e.g., SharePoint), virtualization, configuration management, file sharing, and backup servers. IAIA-1

Checks: C-49396r3_chk

Verify "Smart card is required for interactive logon" is disabled and re-enabled for all smart card required administrative accounts associated with critical servers at least every 60 days. If the setting "Smart card is required for interactive logon" is not disabled then re-enabled for all critical server administrative accounts that require smart card logons at least every 60 days, this is a finding.

Fix: F-49250r3_fix

Disable then re-enable "Smart card is required for interactive logon" for all smart card required critical server administrative accounts at least every 60 days.

b

Other important accounts (VIPS and other administrators) that require smart cards must have the setting Smart card is required for interactive logon disabled and re-enabled at least every 60 days.

IA-5 - Medium - CCI-000199 - V-43651 - SV-56472r2_rule

RMF Control

IA-5

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-000199

Version

AD.0012

Vuln IDs

V-43651

Rule IDs

SV-56472r2_rule

When a smart card is required for a domain account, a long password, unknown to the user, is generated. This password and associated NT hash are not changed as are accounts with passwords controlled by the maximum password age. Disabling and re-enabling the "Smart card is required for interactive logon" replaces the NT hash of the account with a newly randomized hash. Otherwise, the existing NT hash could be re-used for Pass-the-Hash in the future.IAIA-1

Checks: C-49397r3_chk

Verify "Smart card is required for interactive logon" is disabled and re-enabled for all smart card required other important accounts (VIPS and other administrators) at least every 60 days. If the setting "Smart card is required for interactive logon" is not disabled then re-enabled for other important accounts (VIPS and other administrators) that require smart card logons at least every 60 days, this is a finding.

Fix: F-49251r3_fix

Disable then re-enable "Smart card is required for interactive logon" for all smart card required other important accounts (VIPS and other administrators) at least every 60 days.

b

Separate domain accounts must be used to manage public facing servers from any domain accounts used to manage internal servers.

CM-6 - Medium - CCI-000366 - V-43652 - SV-56473r2_rule

RMF Control

CM-6

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-000366

Version

AD.0013

Vuln IDs

V-43652

Rule IDs

SV-56473r2_rule

Public facing servers should be in DMZs with separate Active Directory forests. If, because of operational necessity, this is not possible, lateral movement from these servers must be mitigated within the forest. Having different domain accounts for administering domain joined public facing servers, from domain accounts used on internal servers, protects against an attacker’s lateral movement from a compromised public facing server.IAIA-1

Checks: C-49398r4_chk

If the domain does not have any public facing servers, this is NA. Review the local Administrators group on public facing servers. Only the appropriate administrator groups or accounts responsible for administration of the system may be members of the group. For public facing servers, the Domain Admins group must be replaced by a domain member server administrator group whose members are different from any used to manage internal servers. If any domain accounts or groups used to manage internal servers are members of the local administrators group, this is a finding.

Fix: F-49252r2_fix

If the domain does not have any public facing servers, this is NA. Configure the system to include only administrator groups or accounts that are responsible for the system in the local Administrators group. For public facing servers, replace the Domain Admins group with a domain member server administrator group whose members are different from any used to manage internal servers.

b

Systems used to manage Active Directory (AD admin platforms) must be Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 R2, or later versions of Windows.

CM-6 - Medium - CCI-000366 - V-43710 - SV-56531r2_rule

RMF Control

CM-6

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-000366

Version

AD.MP.0002

Vuln IDs

V-43710

Rule IDs

SV-56531r2_rule

AD admin platforms are used for highly privileged activities. The later versions of Windows offer significant security improvements over earlier versions of Windows. Windows 8.1 and Windows Server 2012 R2, or later, are preferred as they offer even better credential protections.ECSC-1

Checks: C-49400r3_chk

Verify the operating system version on AD admin platforms is at least Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 R2, or later. If the operating system is an earlier version, this is a finding.

Fix: F-49311r2_fix

Use Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 R2, or later as the operating system for all AD admin platforms.

b

Separate domain administrative accounts must be used to manage AD admin platforms from any domain accounts used on, or used to manage, non-AD admin platforms.

CM-6 - Medium - CCI-000366 - V-43711 - SV-56532r2_rule

RMF Control

CM-6

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-000366

Version

AD.MP.0003

Vuln IDs

V-43711

Rule IDs

SV-56532r2_rule

AD admin platforms are used for highly privileged activities. The accounts that have administrative privileges on AD admin platforms must not be used on or used to manage any non-AD admin platforms. Otherwise, there would be a clear path for privilege escalation to EA/DA privileges. Where practicable, dedicated domain accounts that are used to manage AD admin platforms should be utilized, but otherwise Enterprise Admin (EA)/Domain Admin (DA) accounts may be used to manage AD admin platforms.ECPA-1

Checks: C-49401r1_chk

Review the local Administrators group of AD admin platforms. Verify separate domain administrative accounts are used to manage AD admin platforms from non-AD admin platforms. These should be dedicated domain accounts where practicable. Otherwise EA/DA accounts may be used. If accounts used to manage AD admin platforms are used for any non-AD admin platforms, this is a finding.

Fix: F-49312r1_fix

Use separate domain administrative accounts to manage AD admin platforms from non-AD admin platforms. These should be dedicated domain accounts where practicable. Otherwise EA/DA accounts may be used.

b

Usage of administrative accounts must be monitored for suspicious and anomalous activity.

CM-6 - Medium - CCI-000366 - V-43712 - SV-56533r3_rule

RMF Control

CM-6

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-000366

Version

AD.AU.0001

Vuln IDs

V-43712

Rule IDs

SV-56533r3_rule

Monitoring the usage of administrative accounts can alert on suspicious behavior and anomalous account usage that would be indicative of potential malicious credential reuse.ECAT-1

Checks: C-66421r1_chk

Verify account usage events for administrative accounts are being monitored. This includes events related to approved administrative accounts as well as accounts being added to privileged groups such as Administrators, Domain and Enterprise Admins and other organization defined administrative groups. Event monitoring may be implemented through various methods including log aggregation and the use of monitoring tools. Monitor for the events listed below, at minimum. If these events are not monitored, this is a finding. Account Lockouts (Subcategory: User Account Management) 4740 - A user account is locked out. User Added to Privileged Group (Subcategory: Security Group Management) 4728 - A member was added to a security-enabled global group. 4732 - A member was added to a security-enabled local group. 4756 - A member was added to a security-enabled universal group. Successful User Account Login (Subcategory: Logon) 4624 - An account was successfully logged on. Failed User Account Login (Subcategory: Logon) 4625 - An account failed to log on. Account Login with Explicit Credentials (Subcategory: Logon) 4648 - A logon was attempted using explicit credentials.

Fix: F-71809r1_fix

Monitor account usage events for administrative accounts. This includes events related to approved administrative accounts as well as accounts being added to privileged groups such as Administrators, Domain and Enterprise Admins and other organization defined administrative groups. Event monitoring may be implemented through various methods including log aggregation and the use of monitoring tools. Monitor for the events listed below, at minimum. Account Lockouts (Subcategory: User Account Management) 4740 - A user account is locked out. User Added to Privileged Group (Subcategory: Security Group Management) 4728 - A member was added to a security-enabled global group. 4732 - A member was added to a security-enabled local group. 4756 - A member was added to a security-enabled universal group. Successful User Account Login (Subcategory: Logon) 4624 - An account was successfully logged on. Failed User Account Login (Subcategory: Logon) 4625 - An account failed to log on. Account Login with Explicit Credentials (Subcategory: Logon) 4648 - A logon was attempted using explicit credentials. The "Account Usage" section of NSA's "Spotting the Adversary with Windows Event Log Monitoring" provides additional information. http://www.nsa.gov/ia/_files/app/Spotting_the_Adversary_with_Windows_Event_Log_Monitoring.pdf.

b

Systems must be monitored for attempts to use local accounts to log on remotely from other systems.

CM-6 - Medium - CCI-000366 - V-43713 - SV-56534r3_rule

RMF Control

CM-6

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-000366

Version

AD.AU.0002

Vuln IDs

V-43713

Rule IDs

SV-56534r3_rule

Monitoring for the use of local accounts to log on remotely from other systems may indicate attempted lateral movement in a Pass-the-Hash attack.ECAT-1

Checks: C-66425r1_chk

Verify attempts to use local accounts to log on remotely from other systems are being monitored. Event monitoring may be implemented through various methods including log aggregation and the use of monitoring tools. Monitor for the events listed below. If these events are not monitored, this is a finding. More advanced filtering is necessary to obtain the pertinent information than just looking for event IDs. Search for the event IDs listed with the following additional attributes: Logon Type = 3 (Network) Authentication Package Name = NTLM Not a domain logon and not the ANONYMOUS LOGON account Successful User Account Login (Subcategory: Logon) 4624 - An account was successfully logged on. Failed User Account Login (Subcategory: Logon) 4625 - An account failed to log on.

Fix: F-71813r2_fix

Monitor for attempts to use local accounts to log on remotely from other systems. Event monitoring may be implemented through various methods including log aggregation and the use of monitoring tools. Monitor for the events listed below. More advanced filtering is necessary to obtain the pertinent information than just looking for event IDs. Search for the event IDs listed with the following additional attributes: Logon Type = 3 (Network) Authentication Package Name = NTLM Not a domain logon and not the ANONYMOUS LOGON account Successful User Account Login (Subcategory: Logon) 4624 - An account was successfully logged on. Failed User Account Login (Subcategory: Logon) 4625 - An account failed to log on. The "Pass the Hash Detection" section of NSA's "Spotting the Adversary with Windows Event Log Monitoring" provides a sample query for filtering. http://www.nsa.gov/ia/_files/app/Spotting_the_Adversary_with_Windows_Event_Log_Monitoring.pdf.

b

Systems must be monitored for remote desktop logons.

CM-6 - Medium - CCI-000366 - V-43714 - SV-56535r3_rule

RMF Control

CM-6

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-000366

Version

AD.AU.0003

Vuln IDs

V-43714

Rule IDs

SV-56535r3_rule

Remote Desktop activity for administration should be limited to specific administrators, and from limited management workstations. Monitoring for any Remote Desktop logins outside of expected activity can alert on suspicious behavior and anomalous account usage that could be indicative of potential malicious credential reuse.ECAT-1

Checks: C-66429r1_chk

Verify Remote Desktop logins are being monitored. Event monitoring may be implemented through various methods including log aggregation and the use of monitoring tools. Monitor for the events listed below. If these events are not monitored, this is a finding. More advanced filtering is necessary to obtain the pertinent information than just looking for event IDs. Search for the event IDs listed with the following additional attributes: Logon Type = 10 (RemoteInteractive) Authentication Package Name = Negotiate Successful User Account Login (Subcategory: Logon) 4624 - An account was successfully logged on.

Fix: F-71817r1_fix

More advanced filtering is necessary to obtain the pertinent information than just looking for event IDs. Search for the event IDs listed with the following additional attributes: Logon Type = 10 (RemoteInteractive) Authentication Package Name = Negotiate Successful User Account Login (Subcategory: Logon) 4624 - An account was successfully logged on. The "Remote Desktop Logon Detection" section of NSA's "Spotting the Adversary with Windows Event Log Monitoring" provides a sample query for filtering. http://www.nsa.gov/ia/_files/app/Spotting_the_Adversary_with_Windows_Event_Log_Monitoring.pdf.

b

Communications from AD admin platforms must be blocked, except with the domain controllers being managed.

SC-3 - Medium - CCI-001084 - V-44058 - SV-56888r2_rule

RMF Control

SC-3

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-001084

Version

AD.MP.0004

Vuln IDs

V-44058

Rule IDs

SV-56888r2_rule

AD admin platforms are used for highly privileged activities. Preventing communications to and from AD admin platforms, except with the domain controllers being managed, protects against an attacker's lateral movement from a compromised platform. Requirements in Firewall and Windows client STIGs restrict inbound communications, however outbound communications must be restricted as well to prevent inadvertent exposure of the privileged credentials used on these platforms.ECSC-1

Checks: C-49473r3_chk

Verify firewall rules prevent outbound communications from AD admin platforms, except for domain controllers being managed. If outbound communications are allowed between AD admin platforms and any other systems other than domain controllers, this is a finding.

Fix: F-49678r3_fix

Maintain firewall rules to prevent outbound communications from AD admin platforms, except with domain controllers being managed.

b

Windows service \ application accounts with administrative privileges and manually managed passwords, must have passwords changed at least every 60 days.

IA-5 - Medium - CCI-000199 - V-44059 - SV-56889r2_rule

RMF Control

IA-5

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-000199

Version

AD.0014

Vuln IDs

V-44059

Rule IDs

SV-56889r2_rule

NT hashes of passwords for accounts that are not changed regularly are susceptible to reuse by attackers using Pass-the-Hash. Windows service \ application account passwords are not typically changed for longer periods of time to ensure availability of the applications. If a service \ application also has administrative privileges it will provide elevated access if compromised.IAIA-1

Checks: C-49474r3_chk

If no Windows service \ application accounts with manually managed passwords have administrative privileges, this is NA. Verify Windows service \ application accounts with administrative privileges and manually managed passwords, have passwords changed at least every 60 days.

Fix: F-49679r4_fix

If no Windows service \ application accounts with manually managed passwords have administrative privileges, this is NA. Change passwords for Windows service \ application accounts with administrative privileges and manually managed passwords, at least every 60 days.

b

Domain controllers must be blocked from Internet access.

CM-6 - Medium - CCI-000366 - V-53727 - SV-67945r1_rule

RMF Control

CM-6

Severity

M

CCI

CCI-000366

Version

AD.0015

Vuln IDs

V-53727

Rule IDs

SV-67945r1_rule

Domain controllers provide access to highly privileged areas of a domain. Such systems with Internet access may be exposed to numerous attacks and compromise the domain. Restricting Internet access for domain controllers will aid in protecting these privileged areas from being compromised.ECSC-1

Checks: C-54679r1_chk

Verify domain controllers are blocked from Internet access. Various methods may be employed to accomplish this, such as restrictions at boundary firewalls, through proxy services, host based firewalls or IPsec. Review the Internet access restrictions with the administrator. If Internet access is not prevented, this is a finding. If a critical function requires Internet access, this must be documented and approved by the organization.

Fix: F-58535r1_fix

Block domain controllers from internet access. This can be accomplished with various methods, such as restrictions at boundary firewalls, proxy services, host based firewalls, or IPsec. If a critical function requires Internet access, this must be documented and approved by the organization.

Content changes 11

Checks: C-7674r2_chk

Fix: F-8049r1_fix

Generate Mitigation Statement:

Checks: C-14102r3_chk

Fix: F-15010r2_fix

Generate Mitigation Statement:

Checks: C-14101r2_chk

Fix: F-27873r1_fix

Generate Mitigation Statement:

Checks: C-66391r2_chk

Fix: F-71779r1_fix

Generate Mitigation Statement:

Checks: C-66395r2_chk

Fix: F-71783r1_fix

Generate Mitigation Statement:

Checks: C-14104r1_chk

Fix: F-15012r1_fix

Generate Mitigation Statement:

Checks: C-66399r1_chk

Fix: F-71787r1_fix

Generate Mitigation Statement:

Checks: C-7696r1_chk

Fix: F-8062r1_fix

Generate Mitigation Statement:

Checks: C-7698r1_chk

Fix: F-8063r1_fix

Generate Mitigation Statement:

Checks: C-7699r1_chk

Fix: F-28136r1_fix

Generate Mitigation Statement:

Checks: C-58507r2_chk

Fix: F-62885r2_fix

Generate Mitigation Statement:

Checks: C-66407r2_chk

Fix: F-71795r1_fix

Generate Mitigation Statement:

Checks: C-66411r2_chk

Fix: F-71799r1_fix

Generate Mitigation Statement:

Checks: C-7707r1_chk

Fix: F-8068r1_fix

Generate Mitigation Statement:

Checks: C-14111r1_chk

Fix: F-28135r1_fix

Generate Mitigation Statement:

Checks: C-58021r1_chk

Fix: F-62383r1_fix

Generate Mitigation Statement:

Checks: C-66415r2_chk

Fix: F-71803r1_fix

Generate Mitigation Statement:

Checks: C-66403r2_chk

Fix: F-71791r1_fix

Generate Mitigation Statement:

Checks: C-32375r1_chk

Fix: F-28702r1_fix

Generate Mitigation Statement:

Checks: C-32377r1_chk

Fix: F-28704r1_fix

Generate Mitigation Statement:

Checks: C-32870r1_chk

Fix: F-29022r1_fix

Generate Mitigation Statement:

Checks: C-44673r3_chk

Fix: F-40963r2_fix

Generate Mitigation Statement:

Checks: C-44674r2_chk

Fix: F-40964r2_fix

Generate Mitigation Statement:

Checks: C-44675r3_chk

Fix: F-40965r3_fix

Generate Mitigation Statement:

Checks: C-44676r3_chk

Fix: F-40966r3_fix

Generate Mitigation Statement:

Checks: C-44677r1_chk

Fix: F-40967r1_fix

Generate Mitigation Statement:

Checks: C-58505r2_chk